I actually hope that come the next alpha/beta, we won't have to use any sort of "findname" functionality for usercontrols. While that will always be useful when dynamically loading xaml, I'd prefer controls follow a codebehind model instead.
Pete
Developer Community Program Manager - XAML, WPF, Silverlight, .NETMF/Gadgeteer
10rem.net - Pete Brown's site and blog | twitter: @pete_brown
I work for the Developer Guidance group in Microsoft. Opinions are my own.
Psychlist1972
Contributor
6802 Points
1079 Posts
Microsoft
Moderator
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Plugins, Reflection, the Downloader object and SecurityCritical code
Nov 13, 2007 06:59 PM | LINK
Thanks Roger, good catch on the "using"
I actually hope that come the next alpha/beta, we won't have to use any sort of "findname" functionality for usercontrols. While that will always be useful when dynamically loading xaml, I'd prefer controls follow a codebehind model instead.
Pete
10rem.net - Pete Brown's site and blog | twitter: @pete_brown
I work for the Developer Guidance group in Microsoft. Opinions are my own.
Roger Larsen
Member
73 Points
34 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Plugins, Reflection, the Downloader object and SecurityCritical code
Nov 13, 2007 08:17 PM | LINK
var ctl = LoadFromXaml() anyone? J
Roger Larsen