Advanced Forum Search Results
-
I disagree. Don't ship it until it's ready, which means have controls.
-
Has anyone seen what all 1.1 will have in it? Just because it says .NET doesn't mean it will have everything you are used to. I don't think your decision should be about language familiarity. If you are a good programmer, you should be able to pick up a new language rather easily, and yes, I understand that takes time, ...
-
Can you give an example? In the future, when we are at Silverlight v. 3, I don't know why it'd be used. On the other hand, this may for developers to use silverlight ajax the way there are flash sites with a non-flash counterpart. Could a business afford not to have both?
-
When the .NET CLR is fully integrated with Silverlight, will that be the end of Ajax? Or does that mean that C#, VB.NET, etc. will generate the Javascript for you? Does it mean the end of Ajax programming? Thanks.
-
Sorry for the double post, but in the article linked to on Silverlight.net has this interesting comment that puts into words exactly what I believe many of use .NET folks are thinking:
The version of Silverlight you choose to introduce to a new project will likely depend on your development team's skill set. If your development team primarily ...
-
Thanks for the post. I appreciate your comments, and while I understand that Silverlight itself can be understood absent from a particular language, that is the only benefit I can see. That is also a major benefit. But having to use lots and lots of javascript when I am used to .NET seems daunting, especially, when 1.1 appears to ...
-
[quote user="eelliston"]
Well, its not that I don't like Flex. I was very impressed with what it could do. But it did lack some of the cool media features that I see in Silver Light. With flex, I had to still rely on building and external Flash media player and wire it up so Flex and Flash could talk to each ...
-
If you have access to System.Drawing you can use asp.net, it seems.
-
Thanks. I'm still confused why anyone is worried about learning 1.0 at all. Is it because it can be used with any server in the background? You mentioned in one of your videos (the video library) that xaml was what was important because soon we'd be able to use any language that Microsoft supports.
Will thinks like ...
-
Then why would I want to do anything in 1.0, if 1.1 uses all of .NET and seems to right around the corner? It doesn't look like it makes much sense to use 1.0.