Silverlight Controls and Silverlight Toolkit

Re: Re: Binding values from a dictionary

slyi — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:43:06 GMT

Using dictionary to strongly-typed object reflection, you can get the following type syntax to work.

<UserControl.Resources>

<local:NotifyRD x:Name="DynamicRD" />

</UserControl.Resources>

....

</StackPanel>

code: http://cid-289eaf995528b9fd.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Public/MDic.zip

Re: Re: Binding values from a dictionary

Odegaard — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:09:49 GMT

Actually I'm trying to get Silverlight code to run on WPF, which should be a straight forward task, especially now with the VisualStateManager for WPF. So I'm only talking about the subset part - Of course I didn't expect there to be the same amount of functionality, but the stuff that is the same, should be the same! I'm amazed at the amount of compiler conditionals I have to put in to actually get this to work. I wish we had compiler conditionals for XAML as well :-)

At the PDC Microsoft several times talked about how easy this now is to share code, but I don't think they really tried it on anything but a very simple application. You don't have to dig very deep before you hit some serious incompatibilities. The session that specifically dealt with this only scratched the surface (all he did was/copy paste a couple lines of XAML from Silverlight to WPF and didn't look at code at all)

The worst part is that fixing some of these issues would cause breaking changes in either Silverlight or WPF. So far the only upside I've had with my code running on both platforms is that since the Silverlight debugger is HORRIBLE at giving helpful error messages, running it as WPF usually gives an error message that is right on the issue.

Re: Re: Binding values from a dictionary

silverbyte — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:03:39 GMT

I agree to your point Odegaard.

I wonder where Silverlight goes. They want to make it to look like WPF.

In the same time, Silverlight can't be WPF obviously but they have to put in Silverlight at least the basic features from WPF otherwise it stays crippled. People with experience in WPF face frustration very soon after starting to work in Silveright.

Re: Binding values from a dictionary

Odegaard — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:32:12 GMT

Thanks, I know I can do it with a type converter, but this is for an API SDK sample/reference, and this solution is going to scare people away. I was hoping for a simple XAML only method.

What about another type than Dictionary that holds string keys and object values? I was trying to go with a anonymous type which does work, but since I don't know the keys until runtime, I would need to look into dynamic languages which I would rather avoid..

I'm getting more and more dissappointed about the differences and inconsistencies between Silverlight and WPF (I'm not just talking about the things they left out). I've come to the conclusion that Silverlight is NOT a subset of WPF. It's a total rewrite from grounds up made to look and feel like WPF, but they missed a LOT along the way. For instance something as basic as x:Key and x:Name are completely messed up in the two frameworks and behaves differently, and something as simple as these binding scenarios just lacks way too much (the binding is/should have been the cool part).

Re: Binding values from a dictionary

Ken Tucker — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:23:45 GMT

I was thinking more along these lines. Keep in mind you would have to bind to a list control to see the values not the properties of the key value collection

the xaml

        <ListBox x:Name="listBox1" Height="200">
            <ListBox.ItemTemplate>
                <DataTemplate>
                    <TextBlock Text="{Binding}"></TextBlock>
                </DataTemplate>
            </ListBox.ItemTemplate>
        </ListBox>

The code

    Private Sub Page_Loaded(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs) Handles Me.Loaded
        Dim ht As New Dictionary(Of String, String)

        For x As Integer = 0 To 20
            Dim s = String.Format("Item {0}", x)
            ht.Add(s, s)
        Next

        listBox1.ItemsSource = ht.Values
    End Sub

Re: Binding values from a dictionary

bryant — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:01:21 GMT

It looks like this really isn't supported.

Here is how you can do this using a type converter:

    public class DictionaryItemConverter : IValueConverter
    {
        public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
        {
            var dict = value as Dictionary<string, string>;
            if (dict != null)
            {
                return dict[parameter as string];
            }
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
        {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }
    }

Then your binding should look like:

    <Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
        <Grid.Resources>
            <local:DictionaryItemConverter x:Name="DictConvert" />
        </Grid.Resources>
        <TextBlock Text="{Binding Converter={StaticResource DictConvert}, ConverterParameter=test}" />
    </Grid>

And you can then pass a dictionary and it should work:

Dictionary<string, string> data = new Dictionary<string, string>();
data.Add("test","Testing 123");
dict.DataContext = data;

I'll do a blog post on this to develop it further. But this should get you started.

Binding values from a dictionary

Odegaard — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:32:05 GMT

I have a Dictionary<string,object> assigned to the datacontext, and want to bind the values in XAML. In WPF I would do like this:

but this doesn't work in Silverlight. I get:
Error: Sys.InvalidOperationException: Invalid XAML for control 'Xaml1'. Invalid attribute value {Binding Path=.[ID]} for property Text.

What is my alternative in Silverlight? I would really like to have code that is identical in Silverlight and WPF. I can live with the XAML being different, but I don't want to have two different code implementations as well (in other words I would really like to stick to using a Dictionary).